|
Action
Research Plan
|
||||
|
School
Vision: Our campus will become the premier middle
school in Dallas ISD
|
||||
|
Goals: a) To determine the impact of discipline on academic achievement
b) To determine the causes
for violations to students’ code of conduct
c) To find possible
solutions for violations to students’ code of conduct
d) To reduce violations to
students’ code of conduct in 50%
|
||||
|
Action
Steps(s):
|
Person(s)
Responsible:
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed
Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
1.
Investigate the volume of teacher discipline
referrals for the 2011-2012 school year
|
Chaparro, Cordoba (Associate Principal),
Aguilar (Office clerk)
|
03-2012 to 05-2012
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files
|
Show evidence progress by presenting a
summary of student discipline referrals
|
|
2.
Analyze data sorting and graphing every
referral by offense, ethnic group, grade level, gender, and teacher generating
the referral; persons responsible
|
Chaparro, Aguilar, and Ramirez
|
03-2012 to 05-2012
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Excel or any spreadsheet software
available
|
Show evidence of progress by presenting a
spreadsheet of referrals sorted by offense, by ethnic group, by grade level of offender, by gender, and
by teacher generating the referral
|
|
3.
Identify students that are consistently
violating the code of conduct
|
Chaparro, Cordoba
|
03-2012 to 05-2012
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Excel or any graphing software
available
|
Evidence of progress by presenting list of
students violating code of conduct.
|
|
4.
Sort and graph code of conduct violators
during the 2011-2012 school year
|
Chaparro, Aguilar, and Ramirez
|
03-2012 to 05-2012
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Excel or any graphing software
available
|
Show evidence of progress in the form of a
collection of graphs for every discipline referral offense by offense, by
ethnic group, by grade level of
offender, by gender, and by teacher
generating the referral
|
|
5.
Investigate frequent code of conduct
violators’ academic status
|
Chaparro, Cordoba
|
03-2012 to 06-2012
|
STAAR,
ACPs, EOCs, and any standardized test taken during 2011-2012 school
year, Computer, Microsoft Office Excel or any spreadsheet software available
|
Summary report for every subject and every
student in the sample on academic status
|
|
6.
Observe the classes of the teachers that
issue the majority of referrals to determine poor classroom management on
those classes triggers students’ misbehaviors, document the number of
students in that class
|
Chaparro, Cordoba, Morris
|
04-2012 to 06-2012
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Word
|
Analysis report for every teacher/class on
classroom management
|
|
7.
Count the number of code of conduct
violators in each classroom and determine if they are distributed evenly
among the different classrooms in the school
|
Chaparro
|
04-2012 to 06-2012
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Excel or any spreadsheet software
available, direct observation
|
Analysis report for every teacher/class on
code of conduct violators distribution
|
|
8.
Create a comparison chart of misbehaving
students’ grades and performance vs. non-misbehaving students’ grades and
performance
|
Chaparro, Aguilar, and Ramirez
|
06-2012 to 08-2012
|
STAAR
ACPs, EOCs, and any standardized test taken during 2011-2012 school
year, Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School internal files, Computer,
Microsoft Office Excel or any spreadsheet software available, direct
observation
|
Collection of graphs showing misbehaving
students’ grades and performance vs. non-misbehaving students’ grades and
performance
|
|
9.
Determine the three major contributors to
the universe of student code of conduct violations
|
Chaparro, Cordoba
|
06-2012 to 08-2012
|
Universe of Student Code of Conduct
Violations Graph
|
Report on the three major contributors to
the universe of student code of conduct violations
|
|
10.
investigate the socioeconomic and emotional
conditions of students that are
consistently violating the code of conduct
|
Chaparro, Toliver and Wright (Counselors),
parents, students
|
08-2012 to 10-2012
|
Demographics report, Counselors’ files, home
visits, and interview with counselors, parents and students,
survey data using Monkey Survey tool.
|
Report on the socioeconomic and emotional
conditions of students that are consistently violating the code of conduct
based on demographics report, counselors’ files, home visits, and interview
with counselors, parents and students, Monkey survey report.
|
|
11.
Investigate with teachers, counselors,
administrators, parents, and students on possible reasons for specific
students' misbehavior;
|
Chaparro, Cordoba, Morris (Principal),
Toliver, Wright, teachers, parents, and students
|
08-2012 to 12-2012
|
Dallas
ISD Student Discipline System/ School internal files, Computer, Microsoft
Office Word, interviews with teachers, counselors, administrators, parents,
and students using
Monkey Survey tool.
|
Report on input given by each interviewed
individual for each case, Monkey survey report.
|
|
12.
Interview teachers, counselors,
administrators, parents, and students on possible solutions to eliminate or
reduce incidences of the three major contributors
|
Chaparro, Cordoba, Morris (Principal),
Toliver, Wright, teachers, parents, and students
|
08-2012 to 12-2012
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Word, interviews with teachers,
counselors, administrators, parents, and students using Monkey Survey tool.
|
Report on input given by each interviewed
individual for each case, Monkey survey report.
|
|
13.
Consult literature, internet, and any source
of information on possible causes and solutions for discipline disruptions
|
Chaparro, Morris, and Cordoba
|
03-2012 to 12-2012
|
Computer, internet, Microsoft Office Word,
books, and literature on student discipline
|
Report on findings from literature consulted
|
|
14.
Make a summary of causes and possible
solutions for student misbehavior combining findings in the interviews,
surveys, literature, and web.
|
Chaparro, Aguilar, and Ramirez
|
10-2012 to 12-2012
|
Computer, internet, Microsoft Office Word,
books, and literature on student discipline
|
Summary report on causes and possible
solutions for student misbehavior combining findings in the interviews,
surveys, literature, and web.
|
|
15.
Make a report on the impact of discipline on
student academic achievement
|
Chaparro
|
10-2012 to 12-2012
|
All the graphics, reports, interviews, and
surveys developed for this action plan, computer, internet, Microsoft Office
Word, Excel, books, and literature on student discipline
|
Final report on the impact of discipline on
student academic achievement
|
|
16.
Implement the possible solutions found on
the combination of literature, research, surveys and interviews
|
Chaparro, Morris, Cordoba, Teachers,
Counselors, Parents, and Students
|
01-2013 to 06-2013
|
Summary report on causes and possible
solutions for student misbehavior from interviews, surveys, literature, and
internet.
|
New analysis of DISD Student Discipline
System/ School’s Internal files after changes have been implemented
|
|
17.
Develop a student discipline plan to address
the consequences and the process of assigning those consequences
|
Students, parents, teachers, and
administrators
|
03-2012 to 08-2012
|
Documented input from, students, parents,
teachers, and administrators
|
Finished product: Student Discipline Plan
|
|
18.
Make an approximation study of the teaching “down
time. Multiply the time teachers devote to correct discipline behavior times
the number of students in the classroom at any given time.
|
Chaparro, teachers
|
03-2012 to 12-2012
|
Documented times by Chaparro and teachers.
|
Final report on Teaching Down Time.
|
|
19.
Monitor trends of violations to students
code of conduct after changes have been implemented
|
Chaparro, Morris, Cordoba, Teachers,
Counselors, Parents, and Students
|
01-2013 to 06-2013
|
Collection of new data. Dallas ISD Student
Discipline System/ School internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Excel or
any spreadsheet software available
|
New Graphs with information gathered after
changes implementation should show a decrease of violations to students’ code
of conduct
|
|
20.
Monitor students’ academic achievement after
changes have been implemented
|
Chaparro, Morris, Cordoba, Teachers,
Counselors, Parents, and Students
|
01-2013 to 06-2013
|
STAAR, ACPs, EOCs, and any standardized test
taken during the second semester of 2013
|
Summary report for every subject and every
student in the new sample on academic achievement
|
|
21.
Make the necessary adjustments and updates
as school year evolves
|
Chaparro, Morris, Cordoba, Teachers,
Counselors, Parents, and Students
|
01-2013 to 06-2013
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Word, Excel or any spreadsheet
software available, STAAR ACPs, EOCs, and any standardized test taken during
the second semester
|
Summary report for every subject and every
student in the new sample on academic achievement and violations to students’
code of conduct
|
|
22.
Set new goal for reduction of violations to
students’ code of conduct. And academic achievement
|
Chaparro, Morris, Cordoba, Teachers,
Counselors, Parents, and Students
|
08-2013 to 06-2014
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Excel or any spreadsheet software
available, STAAR ACPs, EOCs, any standardized test taken during the previous
school year, and any pre-inventory assessment taken at the beginning of the
new school year
|
New goals statement
|
|
23.
Repeat the cycle
|
Chaparro, Morris, Cordoba, Teachers,
Counselors, Parents, and Students
|
08-2013 to 06-2014
|
Dallas ISD Student Discipline System/ School
internal files, Computer, Microsoft Office Word, Excel or any spreadsheet
software available, STAAR ACPs, EOCs, any standardized test taken during the
previous school year, and any pre-inventory assessment taken at the beginning
of the new school year
|
New reports showing progress and/or attainment
of goals
|
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Updated Action Research Plan
Peer suggestions and revisions
I do not have
comments suggesting to make any modifications to my action research project,
however, a comment by Lisa Howard “There is a correlation between the lost
academic time or lack of academic success, and the offenders”, made me think
that it would be an excellent idea to modify my plan to add an approximation
study of the “down time”, which would be the time teachers devote to correct
student behavior, multiplied times the number of students she/he has in the
classroom at any given time, and reflect that approximation study in my action
research plan.
Also Israel GM
commented about a parent’s concern about the number of students in a classroom,
stating that “the size of the class should be smaller than 25 to minimize
discipline issues and provide more attention to the children.”
Israel’s comment prompted me to consider the
relationship between class size and number of discipline referrals, which at
this point can be linked to teachers issuing the most referrals. This analysis
will be included in my action research project as well.
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Javier's CARE Model: Planning Tool
Identify Concerns that must change (look to the future)
(Assign points to concerns from 1 to 3 in the order of the most
important issues to consider.)
1. My biggest concern would be the time
constraint to implement the plan. The results of my study should not take that
long given the importance and the urgency of a solution to the discipline
problem.
2. My second biggest concern is the lack of
support from parents whenever their help is necessary, from answering surveys
and questionnaires to direct intervention to correct students’ behaviors if
that is an option determined in the possible solutions to decrease student code
of conduct violations.
3. My third concern is the lack of continuity of
this plan in case this administrators or I get moved to another school, Will
the new administration or the person replacing me continue with the project? Will
they give the same importance?
Identify Affirmations that must be sustained (look to the present)
(Assign points to affirmations from 1 to 3 in the order of the most
important issues to consider.)
1. Take advantage of the “momentum’. Teachers are
motivated and willing to try anything that may work.
2. Collaboration among the departments. Due to
this administration and many teachers being new, faculty staff is showing some
interest in cooperate and collaborate with some exceptions
3. Our administrators’ willingness to invest time
and other resources in initiatives that may help in improving the academic
level of the students.
SMART Recommendations that must be implemented:
(Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Timely)
(Assign points to recommendations from 1 to 3 in the order of the most
important recommendations to implement.)
1. Reduce in 50% the discipline referrals in the
term of one year.
2. Reduce fights in 80% compared to last year’s recorded fights.
3. Increase the academic level of students in 20%
for the second consecutive year and in 30% for the third year across subjects
in all subgroups.
EVALUATE – Specifically and Often
(Identify the best ways to evaluate the implemented recommendations.)
1. Keep a weekly log of referrals to get timely updated
information and to re-direct efforts if actions implemented are not being
effective.
2. Keep a weekly log of fights to get timely
updated information and to re-direct efforts of actions implemented to prevent
them are not being effective.
3. Common
assessments with a frequency of one every unit, every month, or every six
weeks, depending on every department’s consensus; standardized assessments as
scheduled by the district.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)